uTorrent Vs Azureus

Last night I was getting fed up with Azureus. I had got used to it killing the performance of my computer when it’s in heavy use but ever since the most recent update it along with Java decides to completely freeze my machine to the point where the mouse is no longer responsive whenever I try to exit. So I unistalled everything - all the Java versions I have along with Azureus, rebooting several times along the way as I was asked. So I start fresh go ahead and follow the FAQ on how everything should be installed and what do you know? A complete meltdown again.

Time to find a better solution. bitComet is available but I have read a lot of sour posts from people about it’s ability to actually disable certain functions even when you have them disabled which leave me with the feeling of what gives?? So I have been hearing of µTorrent for a while now (pronounced micro torrent for those not in the know) so I decided to give it a whirl. Holy crap this thing rules. The entire program is just a standalone exe that, in it’s current 1.4 stable release, weighs in at 130KB.

This kind of took me by surprise at first as I failed to read the instructions. Maybe I was thinking it is just a really tiny installer for a really tiny program. When you double click on the exe it fires right up and asks you if you want to associate torrent files with it and will create the association to it’s current location if you say yes. For some reason the idiot inside me decided to click on yes even though I had the exe on my desktop. Well I closed the program and made a folder for it in Program Files (x86) and dropped it in there. When I ran it again it must have noticed the association was invalid (as it was pointing to the desktop) and asked me if I wanted to associate it with torrent files again. Very cool.

There are still a lot of things I love about Azureus and I will keep it on most computers I use but I think for the most part I will be switching to uTorrent. The plus side about writing Azureus in Java is that it will run on more operating systems than just windows which is currently the only platform uTorrent runs on. The performance appears to be spectacular compared to azureus probably largely due to the fact it is not running on top of Java. One of the great this about Azureus is the auto update ability but I have read a few sites online that claim that uTorrent auto update takes less than 5 seconds from start to finish including downloading the update and restarting the client. I don’t think Azureus can even start in that amount of time! It seems like the designer of uTorrent modeled it after Azureus as a slimmed down version that would be PC only.

Head over to µTorrent’s website and check it out.

4 Responses to “uTorrent Vs Azureus”

  1. tim Says:

    nice review of the two. utorrent rocks!

  2. nick Says:

    uTorrent sucks compared to Azureus. Azureus is way faster when it comes to downloading.

  3. nidebaba Says:

    Azureus works pretty well on my comp, and the only issue I ever had with it was that it took up about 50mb of memory, but that doesnt really matter since I have 1 GB of RAM. CPU usage is quite low (about 0-2%) on an AMD 64 3000+ stock speeds and I had around 10 torrents seeding and 2 downloading. Still going to give uTorrent a try though, since people are switching to it, and it uses a lot less memory. Who knows, maybe my speeds will increase a bit. Still leaning toward Azureus though, open source FTW!

  4. Jared0x90 Says:

    Nick : I am curious why you think this - I have a connection advertised at 15Megabits and uTorrent just about always pulls in over 2.0MegaBytes/s given the torrent has a strong enough following. I recently downloaded the FC5 3.1GB DVD ISO < 30min using uTorrent without disturbing anything else running on the machine.

    I have given up on Azureus for months now. Open source is great. Closed source freeware … Oh well it could be worse …

    To all of the x86 assmebly programmers just about any program is open source anyhow :)

Leave a Reply